
| Craig Smith (1947-2007), Founder • John Harbison, Acting Artistic Director • Michael Beattie, Associate Conductor |
Of the pieces that are among the genre that we call the chorale experiments
in the 1st Jahrgang, BWV 138 is clearly the most problematical. It is
in a form to which Bach would never return. It stretches even Bach’s
awesome abilities at musical continuity. But it must be said that in
a way the most experimental moments of the piece are the best. Perhaps
the weakest moments are the conventional parts, and they may fail, and
with Bach this is always relative because this is still a very impressive
piece, because they are not as good as most of the rest of the music
written in this amazing year.
Part of the problem is the readings for the 15th Sunday after Trinity.
Bach thrives on the thorny and inexplicable. This is perhaps the least
difficult Gospel in all of the didactic season of the church year. It
is one of the few Gospels for this season that is based, not upon a
parable but on advice. It is, of course, very good advice (this is the
passage about considering the lilies of the fields), but there is nothing
of the tough nut that most of the parables provide. There is in our
cantata something manufactured about the pain and anxiety. The denoument
with the advent of the bass aria thus makes less of an impact.
The opening is very impressive, and it is clear that Bach is thinking
in a very complex way about the relationship between the chorale and
the recitative. After a pathetic and imitative string figure, the 1st
oboe d’amore comes in with the chorale tune. A solo tenor sings, the
same string melody as at the beginning and finally the chorus comes
in on the first chorale phrase. It is distinctive, even unique to have
an incipit to the chorale sung not to the chorale melody but and independent
tune. This same pattern occurs for the first three phrases of the chorale
and the music comes to a half close on the dominant. This begins an
interesting pattern followed throughout the cantata. The five phrases
of the chorale are divided into two units, one of three phrases, one
of two. These two halves of the chorale are divided by an extended recitative,
with expressive orchestral interludes.
This cantata is from beginning to end continuous. But, unlike some of
the earliest cantatas that try this, the sections are quite large. There
is here a tiny segue secco tenor recitative that leads directly into
the second verse of the chorale. Although many of the same techniques
are used in this verse, we see more activity from the lower voices in
the chorale segments and the last two phrases begin with the chorale
phrase in diminution in the lower voices before its appearance in the
soprano. We then have a curious
gesture, there is more recitative and the last two phrases are repeated
with a different text. There is a different almost deconstructing method
here. As if the chorale must be disected before it can finally be heard
in its complete form.
Up to this point the piece has an interesting narrative quality to it.
It most resembles an earlier Weimar work Cantata BWV 18, which however
used a litany instead of a chorale to connect the recitatives.
In our present cantata Bach here introduces a long and somewhat conventional
bass aria. It is clear that Bach was fond of this piece, for he arranged
it much later as the Gratias in the G Major mass. It has its interesting
points. After a broad beginning melody, a little bouncy
figure is introduced. It surprisingly is throughout
the piece and at key points transferred to the continuo. There is something
strange and unlikely about it as a continuo figure and the whole effect
of this invertible counterpoint ties up nicely with the text’s emphasis
of God governing all things in our lives. But the aria is not really
inspired in its content and somewhat overstays its welcome.
On paper the final chorale, where our chorale is finally allowed to
be heard from beginning to end, looks terrific. Marching oboes puntuate
big sweeping bravura string lines while the chorus sings in block chords.
We have seen this kind of thing work wonderfully. In the next Jahrgang
one could describe the last movement of Cantata BWV 109 in exactly these
same terms. It is one of Bach’s greatest and most impressive chorale
fantasias. Here it doesn’t quite work. What was impressive about the
chorale in Bach’s most experimental approach becomes commonplace in
this most normative of movements. It seems almost churlish, to deny
this cantata its place. It is clearly a piece that Bach struggled over.
But in the end for all that we value his formal experiments, the thing
that really makes his music immortal is the sheer level of inspiration.
This piece, unfortunately, doesn’t consistently have that.
©Craig Smith